E3 2010 – Sony Press Conference – My Thoughts

June 16th, 2010 by Mark Del Rio

Now we come to the end of our show. Sony’s E3 2010 press conference finally takes place. Jack Trenton, President and CEO of Sony Computer Entertainment America, walks onto the stage. He gives us a tour of the PS3 before he introduces Kaz Hirai to talk about the new 3-D features of the PlayStation 3.

Kaz gives us a short preview of what to expect when Sony launches its new 3-D features for the PS3 sometime next year. We don’t see any footage we just hear a lot of talk.

Killzone 3 – finally, we get a live playable demo showing us the 3-D features of this game. Everyone in the audience is given 3-D glasses to watch the demo. Unfortunately for those of us watching this presentation in the comfort of their own home (me), the effect is useless. Nevertheless, Killzone 3 looks spectacular even in 2-D! The graphics look very realistic and the gameplay looks smooth. I kept thinking to myself, “man, it’s too bad this isn’t on the PC ‘cause I’d really love to play with the keyboard and mouse!” Oh well, it’s still a must buy for me. Release date: February 2011. One other detail Sony mentioned is that Killzone 3 would be fully compatible with the new Sony MOVE. Maybe I don’t need a keyboard and mouse after all.

Kaz continues the presentation by showing us a video of third-party games that are coming to the PS3 in 3-D. The list is impressive but the video itself is pretty boring to us at home who could only watch it in 2-D.

Jack takes the stage again to talk about the 10 year anniversary of the PS2. He talks about how its sales are still going strong today. Come on, Sony, this is an E3 press conference not a Board of Directors meeting. Tell us about your new system and games, not your old one.

MOVE — Peter Dille takes the stage to talk about the Sony MOVE. Throughout his entire speech is pretty obvious that he’s reading from the Teleprompter is constantly looking down.

A short video is shown of various developers discussing and praising the Sony MOVE. This short video goes on for far too long with no real footage of the MOVE in use or any games. At this point in the presentation I realize there haven’t been any big announcements. We’re about 30 minutes into the press conference and nothing surprising has happened. What is Sony waiting for? Come on, let’s get to it! Enough of the ass-kissing videos and sales numbers. I wanna’ see games!

Peter talks about the MOVE having “buttons”, and obvious slam to Microsoft and the Kinect. Where is all this negative hostility coming from? Microsoft isn’t playing the mudslinging game. What’s bothering me more is the fact that Peter still keeps looking down at the Teleprompter. It’s annoying.

At this point I start experiencing some connection problems I don’t know if it’s going on at the show floor or if it’s happening at the gametrailers.com streaming servers. The video keeps jumping back and forth by a few seconds. I don’t really miss too much but it is very annoying.

Sorcery — at first glance this game looks like a Harry Potter type knockoff. You use the Sony MOVE to swing your wand and fight off all kinds of villainous and monstrous characters. It didn’t take very long for the audience to realize that this was a very unique game. The movements looked natural and very smooth. Also the color of the glowing ball on the end of the MOVE changed to match what was going on on-screen. The audience burst into applause several times throughout the demonstration. Very cool indeed, Sony.

Tiger Woods PGA Tour 11 — I’m not really into sports games, outside of racing games, so I don’t have much to say about Tiger Woods. The graphics looked good in the MOVE control seemed natural.

Suddenly the streaming goes all out of whack. The video jumps back and forth a few seconds constantly. It’s really hard to watch the presentation at this point. Fortunately the video returns back to normal before the Tiger Woods presentation ends.

Heroes on the MOVE — not many details are given about this game other than it stars Ratchet and Clank, Jak and Dexter, and Sly Cooper all in one game. Is it a linear action game? Is it an adventure game with multiple quests and puzzles? Who knows.

I’m starting to feel a little bit let down; no real big surprises have been announced.

Jack then talks about a new partnership that Sony is doing with Coca-Cola. It’s something along the lines of how PlayStation characters and products will appear on Coke cans or something like that. I don’t know; I don’t care. I just want to see more games. Please, Sony can we just have more games?

Next, comes what I consider to be the low point of Sony’s press conference. Kevin Butler walks out on stage and performs his Sony “corporate guy” routine before the audience. Kevin starts slamming Microsoft, again! He starts talking about gaming life. Yeah, it’s funny but at the same time I ask, what’s the point of this? Why is Sony giving time to the war with their competitors? Why is Sony padding out this conference with so much talk? Are there any surprises left for Sony? Unlike Microsoft and Nintendo’s press conferences, I haven’t seen anything in this press conference that’s made me catch my breath. Then, Jack makes a big announcement.

The Sony MOVE will be available on September 15 in Europe, and September 19 in North America. The controller itself will cost $49.99, and $29.99 for the “nun-chuck”. Wow! That’s two months before Kinect hit stores and possibly cheaper as well! There will be 15 to 20 new titles at launch and several older games will be patched to use Sony MOVE. Finally, some worthy news!

Sony then shows us another video of some of the games and the technology behind MOVE. I’m all excited about motion controllers. I admit they look good and at this point I can’t tell which motion controller I like more -MOVE or Kinect? Both seem to have their advantages and disadvantages. One thing is for sure, Nintendo is sooooooo screwed this Christmas!

Next we get another series of videos giving us a preview of the upcoming Sony PSP advertising campaign. Once again it’s funny to watch, but I can’t help but keep asking, who cares? Show us more games, not marketing videos!

Sony does show us footage from a few of its new PSP games. Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker, InvZimals, God of War: Ghosts of Sparta, just to name a few. They look good but they seem to be lost in the shuffle instead of being individually presented like Microsoft and Nintendo did with their games.

Jack talks up PSN and its success. He said that today casting for season two of “The Tester” starts. He also says that for those of us stuck at home (me), we can visit a virtual E3 Sony floor-booth within HOME. Sounds cool, I have to try that later. Jack keeps talking. In fact he keeps talking too much. Less talk, more games, please!

Little Big Planet 2 — they gather up some audience members on stage and demonstrate a few of the new user made levels and features from the game. I suppose this game is great to some people but to me it looks pretty dull. I don’t want to waste my time creating levels, I just want to play them. Sorry, Little Big Planet is just not for me.

PlayStation Plus — now we get to the big announcement that has been rumored for quite a few months. Sony is finally introducing a paid subscription plan almost similar to Microsoft’s Xbox LIVE. For $49.99 per year you’ll have access to exclusive content like early demos, free games, themes, minis, and other things. What’s interesting to note is that this exclusive content is available to you only while you are an active subscriber. So if you get a game off of PSN through this service and then decide not to pay my bill next year, it’s gone.

Sony promises that the core multiplayer features that are available now on PSN will remain the same to non-paying customers. PlayStation Plus is for those of you who want more. Honestly, I am in awe that Sony actually did this. All those years that Sony ripped Microsoft for charging for Xbox LIVE, and then they pull a stunt like this! Amazing!

Next up, EA games shows us a sneak peek of the new Medal of Honor game which comes out October 10, this year. It looks good. Medal of Honor, Call of Duty – they both look the same to me now and I can’t even tell them apart.

EA then goes on to show us a playable demo of Dead Space 2. Once again the graphics look great, but this is a multi-platform game. Chances are high its going to look better on the 360 or the PC so I’m not so impressed with the PS3 version.

One neat thing about both of these games is the fact that EA is releasing exclusive content to the PS3. Medal of Honor will receive the original PSOne version of Medal of Honor: Frontline. Dead Space 2 will include the Wii version of Dead Space: Extraction.

Suddenly, in a major blow to Microsoft, none other than Gabe Newell walks out to the stage and announces that Portal 2 is coming to the PS3. Gabe apologizes for his numerous comments throughout the years criticizing the architecture of the PS3. This is a very awkward moment indeed. Add to that, he says that the PS3 version of Portal 2 will be the best version available on the console. Wow! Good thing I’m getting the PC version. They show a very brief clip of Portal 2 gameplay and it looks amazing. I can’t wait till next year to play it!

Sony shows off a few more brief clips of games to come.

Final Fantasy XIV: Online — I’m not really final fantasy guy myself so all I can say is that it looks pretty much like the previous one.

Mafia II – I’ll probably end up getting this one on the PC, but Sony is promising exclusive day one content for this game so that may end up being a game changer.

Assassin’s Creed: brotherhood — once again another game with day one exclusive content for the PS3 version. They showed a multiplayer trailer but I had no idea what was going on. I looked good though.

At this point in the conference it strikes me that Sony is really pushing itself into Microsoft’s territory. All of these big exclusives should force the big MS to act fast.

Sony then concluded this segment of the presentation by showing a video of some of the upcoming PS3 games. Not all of them were exclusives though. I thought this was the end of the show. It was almost 2 hours later and I was ready to go eat lunch. No such luck, Sony still had a few more announcements.

Gran Tourismo 5 – this game looked amazingly real with awesome graphics, however this is not my type a racing game. Destruction racing is my thing and there was none of that to be seen in this game. To those of you interested in this game, November 2, this year is the day you want to remember. This game is also 3-D compatible right out of the box.

Infamous 2 – I’ve never gotten around to playing the first game, but I promise I’ll get to it one day. The sequel looked great and I’d love to give it a try. I just have to beat the first one.

Finally, to the surprise of everyone on stage Sony rolled out an actual life-size ice cream truck from the Twisted Metal franchise. That’s right Twisted Metal returns to the PS3 next year. They showed a short multiplayer demo which looked both good and bad. Graphically it looked like it still needed a little bit of work. Some of the explosions didn’t look right and it was also a little choppy. The game isn’t coming out till 2011 so I’m sure they’ll fix those issues by then. Gameplay wise, it looked really fun. The ability to recklessly shoot at your opponents with all kinds of crazy weapons and vehicles looked fantastic. I’ll have to keep my eye on this one.

Jack Trenton comes on stage one more time to close out the show. That’s it! The presentations are over. Now it’s time to walk the floor and try everything out – unless you are stuck in your home like me L.

E3 2010 – Nintendo Press Conference – My Thoughts

June 15th, 2010 by Mark Del Rio

I just finished watching Nintendo’s E3 2010 press conference. Going into this press conference I really wasn’t expecting much from Nintendo. I had no idea which games they were going to announced and what new features they’re going to show off. Here’s my breakdown of the show.

Reggie Fils-Aime steps out onto the stage to introduce the show. She says that technology is a tool and that “experience” is better than “technology”. He’s right, except you can’t have very many great experiences if your technology comes up short – “hint, hint” – Wii HD please?

Nintendo gets right down to business and shows off a brand-new Zelda game: “The Legend of Zelda: Skywards Sword”. The game features 1:1 sword swinging action using the Nintendo Wiimote as a sword and the nun-chuck as a shield. By swinging the sword in different directions you can defeat enemies in a variety of ways. At first it reminded me of the new Metal Gear game on the Xbox 360, but it seems a little bit deeper because of the Nintendo controller. About halfway into the presentation they started having connection errors. The controller wouldn’t respond to the actions onscreen. The presentation started going really bad to the point of where this would end up on YouTube as another infamous E3 moment. They ended this presentation with a release date of 2011.

Mario Sports Mix — at first I thought this was just going to be another Mario sports game. As it turns out this is many Mario sports games mixed into one! Mario and his pals will be able to play soccer, volleyball, dodge ball, and basketball just to name a few. The graphics looked great in the gameplay looked pretty fun. Release date: sometime 2011.

Next, Reggie spends a few moments talking about the Wii and its sales. He plays up how Nintendo had its biggest Christmas last year and how its games continue to outsell its competitors combined. It almost like he’s convincing the audience that there is still some life left in the Wii. Just get back to the games, Reggie.

Wii Party — Nintendo shows off this online multiplayer party game. It features 13 different party games combined into one. The game looks a lot like Wii sports and uses your Mii avatars. It basically looks like kid stuff and uninteresting to me.

Just Dance 2 — obviously a sequel to Just Dance. You basically “just dance” swinging the Wiimote around. This game looked mundane and dated especially after seeing yesterday’s Dance Central on the Xbox 360 using NO controller.

At this point in the presentation I start getting bored. I expect the next group of games to be just as equally uninteresting. Boy, was I wrong.

Golden Sun: Dark Dawn — I’m not really an RPG guy so I don’t have much to say about this game other than for a DS game this looked pretty sweet. Graphics looked great and it looked like it would appeal to core gamers too. Good job, Nintendo.

Goldeneye — okay so this is a remake of the original N64 classic. This was actually leaked last night so I knew it was coming. I don’t know how Nintendo did it but apparently they are able to port the original Rare (now Microsoft owned) game to the Wii. Graphics looked great, gameplay looked intense — one huge disappointment: Daniel Craig as James Bond? What! This was Pierce Brosnan’s movie! Maybe that was part of the arrangement that Nintendo made with a Rare to get the game on the Wii. One other thing that stuck out was the fact that this was a full retail game and not a Wiiware downloadable title. That’s odd; Nintendo doesn’t have enough GameCube games to port over to the Wii? Now they have to port over and N64 games?

Disney’s Epic Mickey — Warren Spector came out onstage to show off this new game. The game takes place in a wasteland called “Venture Land”. This land is full of lost and forgotten characters from Disney’s past. I was really looking forward to learning more about this game and was not disappointed by the presentation. This is a corrupted land and you must make use of both paint and paint thinner to save this world. Mickey has the ability to erase and restore characters. Apparently this game will have some kind of a “moral” system. You’ll be able to choose whether you want to save characters or erase them completely. This will affect later levels and characters you encounter. The game is also a mixture of adventure, platforming, and RPG and uses very different art styles for its different levels. This game looks fantastic and I can’t wait to try it out. No release date given.

Kirby’s Epic Yarn — obviously a new entry into the Kirby franchise. This game looks like it takes place in the world of cloth and fabric. I must say this is a really cool idea and looked amazingly great on the Nintendo Wii. Release date: fall 2010.

It’s at this point in the conference that I start to realize, “Wow! Nintendo really has their act together this year! There are some great games coming out to the Wii!”

Dragon Quest IX: Sentinels of the Starry Skies — this is a Japanese game and is now making his entry to the US. Once again I’m not really RPG guy so I won’t say much about this game other than it’s coming out June 11 and will have a lot of social networking features too.

Metroid: Other M — this game was first announced at last year’s E3 and we haven’t heard much of it since. The video that they showed looks like it has amazing graphics and great action. It looks like the mix of 2-D and 3-D action and puzzles. Release date: August 31 of this year! No way! Good job, Nintendo and Team Ninja.

Donkey Kong Country Returns — this game is made in the tradition of the original Rare classic on the and 64. Amazingly cool cartoony art style with lots of fast and furious action. I can’t wait to give this will try; it looks really fun!

It dawns on me at this point that Nintendo is finally focusing on its key franchises and giving core gamers what they want most — real games. No more stupid Wii B.S. games but actual CORE games! Fantastic job, Nintendo, you really blew me away this year! I may actually go out and buy a Wii now.

Nintendo 3DS — finally the new Nintendo 3DS is revealed in all its glory. Nintendo president, Satoru Iwata, comes out on stage and shows off the new device. It has two screens like the previous model – the top screen being widescreen the bottom screen being touchscreen. The new 3DS will be able to display full 3-D graphics without the use of any 3-D glasses. There will be a slider on the side to adjust the intensity of this effect or remove it completely. New features include better graphics, a motion sensor, and a gyroscope. There’ll be one camera on the front device and two cameras on the back so you’ll be able to take pictures in full 3-D. Another new neat features of fact that the device can play 3-D Hollywood movies out of the box. Of course you need to purchase these movies before you play them.

Another new feature of the Nintendo three DS is that the device will synchronize itself online even when turned off or while playing another game. You’ll be able to receive new data, quests, rankings and other things automatically. Nintendo also announced that they won’t charge anything for this feature.

Nintendo then went on to list a few of the publishers who would be creating games for the new DS. The list is impressive though I will have to see what they come up with before I pass judgment on them.

One final surprise – Nintendo showed off was a game that they had been working on in secret. It was codenamed “Project Sora”. As it turns out this game is actually Kid Icarus Uprising. It is a 3DS exclusive and will feature 3-D graphics. Maybe would have been better if they hadn’t shown that short gameplay video. It was full of bad voice acting and horrible one-liners. The graphics look great, though and I’m sure also like hot cakes when it’s released.

Well, that wraps up Nintendo’s press conference. Sony is next. Time to give them a look and see what they have in store for us this year.

E3 2010 – Microsoft Press Conference – My Thoughts.

June 14th, 2010 by Mark Del Rio

Well, I’ve just finished watching the Microsoft E3 2010 press conference. I have to say that it was a very good show though not as impressive and exciting as last year’s. Having Steven Spielberg on stage last year along with Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr was a tough act to follow. Anyway, the show has ended and here are my thoughts.

Unfortunately I missed the first part of the show due to connection problems (thank you GameTrailers for presenting me with that wonderful black screen for so long). I believe the show started with few promotional trailers of what they were about to unveil along with a preview of the new Call of Duty: Black Ops game. I picked up the show during the Metal Gear Rising presentation.

Metal Gear Rising – at first it looked like another third person action/shooter game. Then a new gameplay mechanic kicked in – the ability to slice anything from any angle with your sword. That looked really cool! If they incorporate Kinect along with the slicing you’ve got a really cool game. I can’t wait to give this a try.

 

Gears of War 3 – Cliff Bleszinsky introduced the new four player co-op campaign. Four players! That’s insane! Sometimes I have trouble just getting one buddy to join me in Gears 2. Anyway the graphics looked great, gameplay looked fantastic, I’m very excited and looking forward to this one.

Fable III – I admit I haven’t played any of the fable games yet (though they are on my must play list). Not much for me to say about this game – looks good but probably will end up being more of the same of the first two.

Kingdoms – this is a new game from Crytek the company responsible for Far Cry and Crisis. There was no gameplay footage to show just a brief CGI teaser. It looked like some kind of medieval/God of War type action game. We’ll have to wait and see how this one turns out.

 

Halo Reach – Bungee spent a bit of time showing off this game. During the presentation I couldn’t stop thinking, man this is more of the same Halo we’ve seen since the first one. There were the same weapons, the same green and purple bullets flying across the screen. Microsoft, just give it a rest. Does anyone realize that this is the fourth Halo game on the Xbox 360? Even Nintendo doesn’t exploit Mario and Zelda this much.

 

Kinect and Xbox live – this was the highlight of the show and Microsoft spent a considerable amount of time showcasing new features that gold members can expect later this year.

1. The first thing Microsoft showcased was the new controller-free dashboard. The ability to move your hands in the air and control your Xbox is amazing. Add to that the fact that the 360 can also recognize your voice and you’ve got one really cool system! It was a great presentation and you could tell the crowd was really getting into it. They were actually applauding while the presenters were still speaking.

2. The next new thing that Microsoft showcased was called Video Kinect. Microsoft Xbox 360 Kinect is also a web cam with an integrated microphone. You’ll be able to video chat with other Xbox 360 users and people on MSN messenger. That was really cool indeed! They also showed a feature where you’ll be able to watch a movie with someone else through Kinect. I have to say that the presenters they got to show this feature looked a little too “wooden” and scripted. Another cool thing about Kinect is that it actually rotates to track you so you’re not limited to standing in one place you can move around the room and the camera will follow you!

 

3. The next big thing that Microsoft showed for gold users is that ESPN will be coming to live. Now I’m not really a big sports fan so I figured I’d just zone out for now. To my surprise there are actually a lot of cool things that caught my attention. Sports fans will be able to watch tons of games – basketball, football, baseball, college sports – you name it, and all of it live! Also with the Kinect feature you’ll be able to rewind plays, check out scores to other games that are currently in progress, and get history and stats for what you’re watching. Pretty cool indeed.

Kinect launch games – Microsoft showed off a few launch games that will be coming out this November along with the Kinect.

1. Kinectimals — this looks like a kid’s game similar to Nintendogs on the DS. The difference being that instead of raising dogs you’ll be raising wild animals including tigers. At first I thought this was little cheesy but after a few moments, a thought finally kicked into my head (yes that does happen sometimes), my daughter would love this game! And I think that is the beauty of kinect.

2. Kinect sports — once again another ripoff of a Nintendo game – WiiSports. After watching the demo I have to say that it looks really great – graphics wise and motion wise. This is really what the Nintendo Wii should have been in the beginning. It took us four years for Microsoft to finally make that Wii HD and boy does it look great!

3. Joyride — cute little arcade racer also played with Xbox avatars. You can do stunts in midair. Looks neat, I like to try it.

4. Kinect Adventures — this is some kind of obstacle course game. You use your body to form different poses to either jump over obstacles or collect coins. This game looks extremely goofy yet extremely fun! Of all the connect demos that I saw in Microsoft’s presentation this is probably the one game I would like to try most!

5. Your Shape — this is a third-party game made by UBI Soft. Like EA Active which is out on the Nintendo Wii, this is another virtual trainer/workout game. The Kinect scans your body is able to tell your height and size and determine the correct workout routine for you. So far my one criticism about this game is the blotchy orange avatar. They need to do something about that because it just looks awful.

6. Dance Central — this game is made by MTV and harmonics (the maker of Rock Band). It’s basically a hip-hop dance game that looks pretty neat. The whole interface and scoring looks similar to Rock Band and I think teens will really love this game.

Finally, it was announced that Kinect launch on November 4, 2010 with 15 titles. Other details are that Kinect will work with all Xbox 360s in existence – both old and new. Microsoft did not give a price for Kinect so you know it will be expensive. I’m hoping it’ll cost in the $50-$100 range. My greatest fear though, is that it’ll be priced in the $100-$200 price range (making it just out of reach of most homes).

Microsoft then showed a few last-minute trailers. The first was for a new LucasArts Star Wars game. There was a demo of in-game footage that looked pretty neat. We’ll have to wait till next year to see the actual game.

They also showed a demo for a new Forza a game coming out next year which would use Kinect. Along with racing you’ll be able to use the Kinect camera to perform a natural 360° virtual tour of each car. That looked kind of cool but I’m more of a Burnout type guy that rather than a Forza a guy.

 

Finally Microsoft saved their biggest surprise for last – that being the introduction of the new Xbox 360 model. This new Xbox will be priced the same as the current models and feature a 250GB hard drive and built-in Wi-Fi. Very cool indeed, however, where is the Blu-Ray drive!? It almost seems pointless to me to have a new redesigned and not throw in a Blu-Ray drive. Come on Microsoft this is 2010 not 1999. Get with the times!

Well, that wraps up this year show I can’t wait for Nintendo and Sony’s presentations tomorrow. How are they going to top Microsoft?

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.10

June 4th, 2010 by Phil Bloom

We are at the end of my 10 part blog on films remade by the same director as the original version.  To recap, the seeds for writing this article came about when news broke that director David Cronenberg was going to be remaking his 1986 film “The Fly”, which originally stared Jeff Goldblum in the starring role.  Days later it was announced that French director Géla Babluani was going to be remaking as a big budget Hollywood film his 2005 French film “13 Tzameti”, this time in color.  It was with this news that I set out to research if there ever had been a director who had done this before?  I was curious if any directors in the past 100+ of film making had learned from the mistakes (even if the original were an excellent film) of the original and redone a later version, with years of maturity, money, and experience behind them?

To my surprise, there were many.  I decided to narrow my field of research to 20 different films, thus giving me a total of 40 to watch (I actually watched 42, counting the two mentioned in the section above!)  Even further to my astonishment, I learned that it is indeed quite possible for a director to turn out a better film.  Not surprisingly, I also learned that it’s possible to turn in a turkey as well.

However, even more to my incredulity, and you’ll see after todays final films, the odds were IN FAVOR of the film turning out better!  A total of 12 were equal or better, in my opinion, and only 8 were worse!  Even then, only a few of those were grades lower in my ratings, with many them being only 1/2 – 1 grade lower!

You’ll be happy to know that todays films were my favorites out of the bunch.  Not favorite remakes, per say, but favorite pairs.  Meaning, I thought that the originals were excellent, and the remakes magical.  Surprisingly (or maybe not!), all 4 of todays films were directed by the same director.  A director that, hitherto, I did not know much about.  However, after watching these 4 films, I realized that I had stumbled upon a director of the highest caliber.  A director that I knew would soon garner a position in my favorite directors list (needless to say, I did view a handful more of his films subsequent to this review, solidifying his standing).

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part X

Remake #19

~Director: Yasujirō Ozu~

Original Film: A Story of Floating Weeds – “Ukikusa Monogatari”
Year: 1934
Cast: Takeshi Sakamoto, Chouko Iida, Koji Mitsui, Yoshiko Tsubouchi
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 86 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

A wonderful little film that is unlike most others of that era.  The acting is subtle and not overacted, as is so common in other silent films.  The engrossing story of a traveling acting troupe that stops into a small Japanese farming town where the master has a former mistress and son whom he decides to visit, inciting a vengeful current mistress, is beautifully told.  It is evident moments into the film that Ozu was a master storyteller, relying on character mannerisms and subtleties to compel the viewer to stay seated.

The film is a testament to how one little sin can snowball and affect so many people, not just the one who committed the sin.  A truly wonderful piece of film from one of Japan’s most celebrated filmmakers.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake Film: Floating Weeds – “Ukigusa”
Year: 1959
Cast: Ganjiro Nakamura, Machiko Kyō, Hiroshi Kawaguchi, Haruko Sugimura, Ayako Wakao
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 119 mins / Color / OAR 1.37:1

An absolutely wonderful film.  Simply put, one of the best.  Wonderful musical score and spectacular script easily make this a huge improvement on an already excellent film (the 1934 original).  Director Ozu has flushed out the story, added some very witty humor, and cast the perfect actors to pull off this story of a traveling acting troupe that stops into a small Japanese farming town where the master has a former mistress and son whom he decides to visit, inciting a vengeful current mistress.  Most of the humorous scenes are part of the side story, which is about the other actors in the troupe seeking to find women to keep company with while in town.

The only question I had regarding Ozu’s direction was the choice to have the actors speak directly into the camera when addressing the offscreen character, instead of an over-the-shoulder or a two-shot framing.  I felt myself being pulled out of the film each time this occurred.

The cinematography is simply gorgeous, with colors popping off the screen in the most vibrant of ways.  The story itself is a simple one, yet powerful in that it shows how one man’s sin will affect so many around him.  A must own.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake #20

~Director: Yasujirō Ozu~

Original Film: Late Spring – “Banshun”
Year: 1949
Cast: Chishu Ryu, Setsuko Hara, Haruko Sugimura, Yumeji Tsukioka, Yoshiko Tsubouchi
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 108 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

A gratifying character driven story about a widowed man who desires to marry off his stubborn daughter, lying about his own engagement in order to do so.  This film was an entertaining film, but lacked any real drama.  It served more as a day-in-the-life-of genre  film than a dramatic film in the truest sense of the word.

Interestingly, Ozu chose to have the characters speak directly into the camera when addressing another character, instead of an Over-the-shoulder shot, or two shot.  The second or third time it happens, I no longer noticed it, which is an indication of the quality of filmmaking.

While a very slow moving film, one that likely would never get made today due to the current nature of the flash, bang, cut, music video style films, it was still a very well acted film, with wonderful music, and an interesting peek into middle class life in early postwar Japan.  The cinematography is superb, and truly shows that images can indeed tell a story.  Another case to show that editing isn’t cutting every 3 seconds, but letting a scene play out and breathe to tell a more effective story.

A very well made film.

My Rating: ***** / A-

Remake Film:  Late Autumn – “Akibiyori”
Year: 1960
Cast: Setsuko Hara, Yôko Tsukasa, Mariko Okada, Keiji Sada, Miyuki Kuwano, Chishu Ryu
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 128 mins / Color / OAR 1.37:1

A very amusing remake of “Late Spring” changes some things from the original version (strangely enough, the title, as you can see) that give it more drama and tension.  The change from the father widow to a mother widow made the desire for the girl to stay and help her parent instead of getting married all the more dramatic, as the two women go through similar situations with courting men.  Including the fathers friends as the men attempting to marry off his daughter has added delightful humor, as well as a dramatic element of the pressure of men to see their daughters married.

A wonderful jazz score, a script that could be made again today with it’s portrayal of adults and their views on “young kids today”, along with the beautiful cinematography all elevate this film above the previous in a minor way.

Again, as seems to be common with Ozu, there is one directorial decision I still don’t quite understand?  Why Ozu has his characters directly addressing the camera in CU’s instead of an over-the-shoulder two shot is unclear.  Happily, after seeing it for a few films now, I have an opinion on the matter.  I would surmise that Ozu feels it allows the viewer to see inside the soul of his characters, giving them more personality.

A wonderful film through and through.  A true classic.

My Rating: ***** / A

Hope you enjoyed this series.  I’m off now to catch some much needed sleep!!!…

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.9

June 3rd, 2010 by Phil Bloom

Very nearly down to the last 4 films and their remakes.  I trust you’ve enjoyed the articles as much as I did watching the films and writing about them.  In fact, do yourself a favor and take a look at a few of them, if nothing else.  Get yourself geared up for the next wave of remakes coming soon to the local mega-plex.

I’m confident you’ll have as much fun as I did.

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part IX

Remake #17

~Director: Roger Vadim~

Original Film: And God Created Woman – “Et Dieu… créa la femme”
Year: 1956
Cast: Brigitte Bardot, Curd Jürgens, Jean-Louis Trintignant, Christian Marquand
Language: French
Country: France
Specs: 95 mins / Color / OAR 2.35:1 – Cinemascope

Film opens with shot of Bardot in the buff, and continues to feature her in revealing clothing, bikinis, nude, and prancing about in the most sexually enticing way.  Little else is needed to be said about this otherwise boring film.  Put some clothes on the woman who earned the term “Sex Kitten” from this film, and you have nothing.  Pointless story of a man who marries a woman known as the town floozy only to have a hard time taming her is without much action, drama, or tension.  In fact, is reeks of Vadim’s similarity to director John Derek (just as Derek made pointless films to showcase his wife’s naked body, Vadim seems to have done the same here with his wife Bardot).

The only thing I could see is that for 1956, this must have sent young men the world over into a frenzy, as this would have been the most titillating thing to hit the screen since the Hayes Code was in effect.

Yawn.

My Rating: *** / C-

Remake Film: And God Created Woman
Year: 1988
Cast: Rebecca De Mornay, Vincent Spano, Frank Langella, Donovan Leitch Jr.
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 100 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

Wow.  I’m not quite sure why this remake of the 1956 film was made other than to feature steamy gratuitous sex scenes with DeMornay (Vadim’s girlfriend at the time)!  It has ZERO to do with the original, other than there is a steamy blonde woman who likes sex as the lead.  We get a silly setup with a woman escaping out of prison, only to be picked up while hitchhiking by a man running for governor.  He returns her to prison where she sees a janitor and decides to have sex with him.  This begins the very unbelievable story of him marrying her, getting jealous of her, her joining a rock band, having an affair with the governor in running, befriending a little boy who is motherless, trying to avoid returning to jail for breaking parole (not sure how having sex is considered breaking parole?), and gets the crowd dancing and cheering her band on at the governors ball she crashed.  Right.

The chemistry between the two leads is absurd, but not as much as the “story”, or lack thereof.  As with Vadim’s original (where it seemed little more than an excuse to feature Vadim’s spouse Bardot in what then would have been on par with what we’re presented with in this film), it is very apparent that story mattered not in this exploitation film, even though that’s not what it aims to be.  None of the scenes feel connected.  Rather, the story comes across as a number of mini vignettes all strung together to attempt to make sense.

I’m being a little harsh perhaps.  Thankfully the acting wasn’t over-the-top bad (“Insert sarcasm here”).

One thing is for certain.  Cinemax surely has this film in rotation at least twice per week.

My Rating: ** / D

Remake #18

~Director: William Wyler~

Original Film: These Three
Year: 1936
Cast: Miriam Hopkins, Merle Oberon, Joel McCrea, Bonita Granville
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 97 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

It’s rare that a film can get the viewer to truly hate one of the main characters.  Thankfully, Wyler has done just that in this tense, gripping tale of lies, deceit, and gossip, and how those three vices can utterly destroy a persons reputation when used with malice.  Granville is simply amazing in her portrayal of the viciously deceptive and controlling wicked little girl.  (If only this had been in 3D, I could have reached out and slapped her character!)

While hints at the original stage-plays story comes across at the start (the relationship between the women is never clearly defined and is quite vague) the story of the alleged affair with the others fiance is so cleverly written and believable it’s frightening.

It’s no wonder why Granville was nominated for Best Supporting Actress.  I’m dumbfounded why Wyler, screenwriter Lillian Hellman, or any of the other brilliant performers didn’t receive any nominations.  A truly remarkable moment in film.

My Rating: ***** / A-

Remake Film: The Children’s Hour
Year: 1961
Cast: Audrey Hepburn, Shirley MacLaine, James Garner, Miriam Hopkins, Fay Bainter, Karen Balkin, Veronica Cartwright, Hope Summers
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 107 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.66:1

This remake of “These Three”, while an entertaining film, doesn’t hold a candle to the original.  For starters, the little girl is no longer portrayed as wickedly evil as she marvelously was in the previous film.  The main reason for that would be the accusations in this film are not entirely unfounded, just simply embellished.  That is where the problem with this film lies.  By doing so, the film loses it’s main antagonist; that being lying, deceitful, maliciously slanderous gossip.  The focal point instead shifts to an implied morality tale that it’s wrong to judge someone because they are gay (which is true, but not what the first film was about).  Having the two characters actually have lesbian sexual attraction between them only hurts the plot (which, as stated, worked better as malicious vindictive gossip and lies), and takes away from the tension found in the original.

My Rating: *** / C+

Back tomorrow for the final post in this 10 part series…

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.8

June 2nd, 2010 by Phil Bloom

As I write this article in the continuing series, I think of the current tendency for Hollywood to focus on remakes, reboots, and re-imaginings of previously produced pictures.  I wonder if those behind the remakes have a tendency to first ask the original directors if they would be interested in directing the remake, or if they simply forgo that for whichever director is cheap enough and/or “hot” at the moment?

I would have to do another series of articles to see if my impression is that remakes from different directors usually fare better or worse than the originals?  Considering my most recent visits to the box office, I’m willing to say they are worse off.  The last few remakes that I’ve spent my $15 on were bad enough for me to wish I had waited to Netflix it instead.  At least with the original directors there is a fighting chance they would be as good if not better.

Anyone have an opinion on that?

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part VIII

Remake #15

~Director: Michael Haneke~

Original Film: Funny Games
Year: 1997
Cast: Susanne Lothar, Ulrich Mühe, Arno Frisch, Frank Giering, Stefan Clapczynski
Language: German
Country: Austria
Specs: 108 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

The discomfiting opening title sequence (not what you think!) sets the mood for this eerie disturbing tale.  The movie starts with slow long cuts of a family of three driving through the countryside with classical music playing on the radio, when suddenly, hard-core death punk music begins playing under the titles.  It jumps at you, and juxtaposed with the idyllic family amidst the countryside exterior, is rather jarring.

Cleverly, for the remainder of the film, there are only a few more instances of music, and it is always in the scene, coming from a radio.  This near lack of music lends to an uncomfortable ambience.  Haneke favors very long takes with little camera movement, which immediately reveals that this is not a traditional Hollywood film. This is further solidified by the 3rd act, with its depressing and dark finale.

One puzzling aspect of the film was why Haneke chose to break the fourth wall a few times (the character addresses the audience).  Another even more baffling scene involves a remote control rewinding sequence (I don’t want to spoil anything here, but you’ll see what I mean when you view it!).  The thing I “enjoyed” was the lack of any real predictability (other than the “tag” on the end of the film), even though it left me much too uncomfortable to likely view again.

My Rating: *** / C

Remake Film: Funny Games
Year: 2007
Cast: Naomi Watts, Tim Roth, Michael Pitt, Brady Corbet
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 111 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

A nearly shot for shot, word for word (with a few minor changes) remake of the 1997 film of the same name left me unclear of one thing:  Why in the world did Haneke choose to do this?  Don’t get me wrong, this version of the film is indeed a better version, as the actors this time around are simply superb.  Not sure, however, why he nor the studio left in the bewildering elements from the first version that had me scratching my head (the breaking of the fourth wall, the remote control sequence)?  Nor why he didn’t use this opportunity to flush out his script, or make some other minor tweaks to bring the film up another level?  Indeed, as it stands, it seems it would have simply been better financially to “dub” the original into English and bring it here to the States.

Just as the original, obviously, this film is pure “edge of the seat” suspense from the first frame to the last.  Of course, again obviously, my review remains the same as the previous film.  Much too dark for a “third” viewing!

My Rating: *** / C+

Remake #16

~Director: Raoul Walsh~

Original Film: High Sierra
Year: 1941
Cast: Humphrey Bogart, Ida Lupino
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 100 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

An excellent caper film with loads of tense suspenseful drama make this one of the best.  Bogart is simply a wonderful baddy, who is sucked back into his former life of crime to pay back the “big boss” who saw to his early parole.  The film doesn’t have many sour points, other than the portrayal of a “yes boss!” black servant early in the film.  The car chase through the Sierra’s is an early example of fine action, with the tension building around every sharp turn.

A wonderful “gangster” film that any fan of Bogart’s will simply enjoy.

Oh yeah, and the scenery isn’t bad either!

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake Film: Colorado Territory
Year: 1949
Cast: Joel McCrea, Virginia Mayo, Dorothy Malone
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 94 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

This remake of “High Sierra” has had a major overhaul and set as a Western this go around.  The basic script remains intact, with a few minor changes here and there, most notably the ending becoming more of a “Bonnie and Clyde” ending set in some ancient Indian ruins.  While this version features stunning scenery, the acting is a step down from the original, now more akin to B-level status.  The chemistry between McCrea and Mayo is nonexistent, feeling very stale and forced.

Certain elements that differ from the original are the crippled girl is now simply a normal girl, the “inside man” no longer gives up the info because he was nearly killed and abandoned, but turns them in before the heist even happens, and McCrea’s character gets more sympathetic, becoming more of a “Robin Hood” than Bogarts rendition.

The strangest decision Walsh added this time around regards the abandoned Mission storyline.  We see Mayo’s character praying at the cross, we see them desiring a wedding with the monk, we see Mayo tithing the stolen money to the church, and we see the church happily accepting the money and keeping it a secret from the authorities in order to bring back it’s long forgotten congregation.  Very strange message indeed.

An entertaining western yes.  Better than the original?  As Tonto would say, “Me no think so.”

My Rating: *** / C

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.7

June 1st, 2010 by Phil Bloom

It’s hard to believe that today marks 28 of the 40 films that I am writing about in this 10 part blog!  I am beginning to think, based on my reviews of these first 14 films and their remakes, that the remakes of “The Fly” and “13 Tzameti” by original directors David Cronenberg and Géla Babluani, respectively, have a 50% chance of being better.  That is far better than I would have expected.

How will the last few days pan out?  Will the pendulum swing one way or the other?  Or will Lady Justice’s scales remain evened out?  Read on to find out in…

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part VII

Remake #13

~Director: Kenji Mizoguchi~

Original Film: Sisters of the Gion – “Gion no shimai”
Year: 1936
Cast: Isuzu Yamada, Yoko Umemura, Benkei Shiganoya, Fumio Okura
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 69 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

A wonderful story of two sisters who are Geisha’s, one a man-hating, conniving, lying woman, the other a matured ready to settle down woman.  This black and white Japanese film is amongst the best, with it’s excellent story and acting to boot.  The wickedness of the younger sister is so believable, you want to reach through the screen and slap her.  The deceptions she goes through are so engrossing, the broken hearts of the men so saddening, that you soon realize Mizoguchi accomplished something years before multifaceted tales of deception such as “Fargo”, “Magnolia” or “Crash” did.  The way he interweaves the stories is simply astounding.

The film is about prostitutes, so children may not be suitable to see this film.  However, it is a true masterpiece from one of Japan’s early filmmakers.

My Rating: ***** / A-

Remake Film: A Geisha – “Gion Bayashi”
Year: 1953
Cast: Michiyo Kogure, Ayako Wakao, Seizaburo Kawazu
Language: Japanese
Country: Japan
Specs: 85 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

This biting tale of Geisha’s in postwar Japan is a sad tale of a young girl who, out of necessity, becomes a Geisha thinking it a position of respect and beauty.  She soon learns that it is nothing more than a second class glamorized prostitute, and her house “mom” is nothing more than a Madame.

While billed as a remake of Mizoguchi’s earlier “Sisters of the Gion”, little resemblance is made to that earlier film, other than both focus on the sad life of a Geisha and both are in Black and White.  A wonderful film that is moving and educational at the same time, with simply beautiful cinematography.

An attempted rape scene is the most disturbing scene in the film, and truly shows the horrors that women in Japan suffered under the guise of entertainers.  Truly a remarkable film from a talented director.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake #14

~Director: Leo McCarey~

Original Film: Love Affair
Year: 1939
Cast: Charles Boyer, Irene Dunne
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 88 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

An entertaining film that has a story too far fetched to believe.  An engaged American woman meets a playboy foreign celebrity man on a cruise ship, where they engage in a love affair.  Days later, they end the cruise with a promise to meet on top of the Empire State Bldg. in 6 months if they are both single.  Surprise, they are, and surprise, they both attempt to meet.  After a car accident cripples the woman, she runs away to Europe, where 6 months later they meet again in a movie theater (all the while they both pine away for each other) and reconnect.

The film does have heart tugging moments, and the acting is very well done.  In fact, the chemistry between the two is spot on.  It’s simply the story that knocks this film down a few notches on my scale.

My Rating: *** / C

Remake Film: An Affair to Remember
Year: 1957
Cast: Cary Grant, Deborah Kerr
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 119 mins / Color / OAR 2.35:1 – Cinemascope

This almost identical remake to “Love Affair” improves every so slightly by casting two wonderful actors in Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr, and filming it in beautiful color and Cinemascope.  Much better performances than the already well acted original helped flush out the characters a bit more, adding a little depth to the decisions they make.  Still, however, the story is a little unbelievable, with the whole premise being a bit immature and far fetched at best.  As with the original, the musical segments seem a little out of place, as though they were inserted to add length to the film, or to capitalize on the musical craze throughout films of that era.

Regardless, the film is an entertaining film.  Historically speaking, it’s nice to see a film that received so many accolades from the Academy of that year.

My Rating: *** / C+

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.6

May 31st, 2010 by Phil Bloom

On this Memorial Day, I bring you another article in the continuing series sparked by the news of the remakes of “The Fly” and “13 Tzameti”.  Be sure to catch up on last weeks entries along with today’s.  Feel free to leave comments about the choices in films, as well as the reviews themselves.

And have a very safe and enjoyable Memorial Day.

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part VI

Remake #11

~Director: Jean-Marie Poire~

Original Film: Les Visiteurs
Year: 1993
Cast: Christian Clavier, Jean Reno, Valérie Lemercier, Christian Bujeau
Language: French
Country: France
Specs: 107 mins / Color / OAR 2.35:1

It’s not everyday that a film comes along featuring such a different take on an old formula that it simply stands apart from all the rest.  “Les Visiteurs” is just that film.  A very funny, crazy, goofball of a film in the style of Terry Gilliam starts the ball rolling right from the start and doesn’t stop until the very last frame (they even included a little note for people who stay to watch the credits!).  This out-of-time time travel film is so heavily influenced by the French language and its unique attraction, as well as the nuances of similar sounding words in French that translate to two entirely different meanings as the core of many jokes, that any person who enjoys foreign films is bound to enjoy this tale.

The humor is not over the top “Jim Carrey” style, yet it is a subdued slapstick, where none of the characters are “in on” the jokes, they just happen as in real life situations.  No contorted faces, no double entendres, and no sex jokes.

In its place we have humor relying on situations, humor relying on prosthetic make-up gags, and, as mentioned previously, nuance with the translation of the French language.

Not at all what I was expecting.  A pleasant surprise indeed.

My Rating: ***** / A-

Remake Film: Just Visiting
Year: 2001
Cast: Jean Reno, Christina Applegate, Christian Clavier, Malcolm McDowell, Tara Reid, Bridgette Wilson
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 88 mins / Color / OAR 2.35:1

A remake of the 1993 French Film “Les Visiteurs” that begins to fail with the change in the title. Wow!  What a tired, boring, unfunny typical Hollywood film.  This remake of the much superior earlier version is the perfect example of a great film destroyed by the hands of Hollywood.  For starters, why they let John Hughes rewrite the script originally penned by the director and costar of this film as well as the original is beyond me.  The original story by Jean-Marie Poiré and Christian Clavier was filled with so much dry humor, that replacing it with stereotypical fare did nothing but destroy the idea.

For starters, the entire plot of the film has been rewritten.  The quirky Terry Gilliam-ish comedy has been erased, and elements such as “everyone in the town starts acting like the ‘crazy’ visitors, cause they are cool!” have been added.

That’s not all.

The heir to the throne and the “by the books” husband have been replaced by a museum curator and her (seen in any number of films) smarmy live-in boyfriend who is only with her for her potential money; the character that was a descendant of the servant has been completely erased; the wizard, who in the original left his plans to save them to his descendant, has been transported with them and becomes a Willie Nelson looking character; in an offensive “racist” change the characters constantly blame the zaniness on the travelers being “French”; an unnecessary women’s empowerment storyline has been introduced (I can see how it was needed in this version, however, as they added the idiotic boyfriend).  That and a hip-hop soundtrack, club scenes, and relocation from the European countryside in the original to Chicago (hmm, wonder if Hughes had anything to do with that one?) in this version are all travesties.

An unfunny film, unfunny script, and unfunny acting.

That, to me, isn’t even fun.

My Rating: ** / D

Remake #12

~Director: John Farrow~

Original Film: Five Came Back
Year: 1939
Cast: Chester Morris, Lucille Ball, John Carradine, Allen Jenkins, Patric Knowles, Casey Johnson
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 75 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

An entertaining film that does a great job at building suspense.  The script develops the 12 characters very well, giving them each their own interesting qualities.  The acting is very well done, and the direction/editing only enhances the film.  Truly one of the first in what would later become known as a disaster film, especially in similar films such as the successful “Airport” series from the 70’s.  The fact that the title tells us how many will survive is suspenseful enough.  However, the suspense kind of dies down near the end of the film, and becomes a little predictable.

The look of the film is dated, however.  The locations are obviously sets, yet that never truly matters as the story is engrossing enough to overshadow that minor point.  Overall, an enjoyable thrill ride.

My Rating: **** / B-

Remake Film: Back from Eternity
Year: 1956
Cast: Robert Ryan, Anita Ekberg, Rod Steiger, Phyllis Kirk, Keith Andes, Gene Barry
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 100 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

This remake of the better 1939 version, “Five Came Back” is still entertaining, just not as full of thrills as the original.  Basically a flushed out script, with more character exposition, and actual beautiful locations in place of backdrop sets for most of the traveling shots is hurt by fan service segments (two women wrestle in the river, one in a thin white top even!), stagey dialogue (“Let’s go over there” “Yes let’s”. “Let’s go find out” “OK, let’s move now”.), and the odd casting of Rod Steiger as the South American immigrant Vasquez.

In addition, having Vasquez become an attempted assassin of an evil South American dictator instead of his being a cold hearted killer (as the character is in the original) has far less of an impact on his sacrifice he makes at the end of the film, and makes him more into just one of the passengers with a past.

Unfortunate.

My Rating: *** / C

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.5

May 28th, 2010 by Phil Bloom

This past week I’ve reviewed 8 films that were remade by the director who directed the original version (that comment may be a misnomer, as some of the “original” films were actually remakes themselves!).  Today we will close out the week by taking a look at 2 more films, which will bring us to the halfway point.  It is to be hoped that if nothing else, this series of articles will give you all some films to add to your queues, and give others a list of films to watch over this three day weekend.

Yesterday, I took a look at two films whose remakes paled in comparison to the original versions.  Thankfully, that is not always the case, as we will see in today’s post titled:

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part V

Remake #9

~Director: Michael Mann~

Original Film: L.A. Takedown
Year: 1989
Cast: Scott Plank, Alex McArthur, Michael Rooker, Daniel Baldwin, Xander Berkeley
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 97 mins / Color / OAR 1.33:1

I really wanted to like this made-for-television film.  On the surface, it is an entertaining crime/thriller with an intriguing premise.  However, it feels rushed and miscast, unfortunate though it may be.  Story revolves around a rag tag group of professional hold up men and their desire to make their final “hit” before “retiring”.  Meanwhile, a no-holds-bared detective is hot on their trail, mostly just moments behind each step they take.

Most of the acting in this film is mediocre at best, with dialogue bordering on hokey in many of the scenes.  It felt as though the script was written to make the villains/heroes look cool, but it came across as amateur filmmaking.  The music is nicely chosen, and fits the mood of the film very well, as is usually the case with a Michael Mann film.  However, it wasn’t utilized nearly as much as it ought to have been.  Many of the scenes could have used some background music to set a mood, instead of the (what sounded like) the raw audio track.  A couple of times the character that was off screen says their line, and it sounds like the mic on the “on camera” character was used to record it.

In addition, the story felt completely rushed.  It felt as though a number of scenes had been excised, to fit it into a 90 minute window.  The storyline of Vincent, the cop, and his girlfriend isn’t very deep.  I was completely removed from the film (similar to my reactions to the current season of “24”) by the girlfriends actions suddenly halfway through the film, as they were completely unbelievable.  She gets upset with him because he fought off some harassments in a bar, in which she tells him “You don’t care about me, you care about the job”.  Never were we led to feel that way.  Also, Pat and his girlfriend all of a one-night stand are deeply in love with each other, and she is upset that he lied to her and is a bank-robber?  Again, too much happens to fast.
I got lost in the sudden mentioning of character names, without showing faces, in the convoluted “who turned on who?” finale.  And the ending was very anticlimactic.  SPOILER ALERT:  I never felt tension between the police and Pat, who dies in a hotel hallway after Waingro shoots him through the wall, then jumps to his death.  Could have certainly used an additional 30 minutes or more of exposition/story.

To his credit, I understand Mann was forced to make changes to his much longer and detailed screenplay when he learned that his script “Heat” would not be a theatrical feature after all, but a watered down made for TV film.

Still, too much was missing in the way of story for it to make much difference.

My Rating: *** / C

Remake Film: Heat
Year: 1995
Cast: Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Val Kilmer, Tom Sizemore and Jon Voight
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 188 mins / Color / OAR 2.35:1

Excellence in filmmaking sums up “Heat”.  Right from the start, we are introduced to a thought out intricate plot.  At moment 1 we are launched into a scene full of intense suspense, fast paced action, and superb acting to bring it all together.  Mann has taken his first incarnation of this, “L.A. Takedown”, and flushed it out immensely, given the characters wonderful exposition, obtained a wonderful cast, and brought his budget up tenfold.

For starters, the intensity level has been ramped up to 11 in the multifaceted character piece.  The bank shootout itself is one of the best action sequences ever captured on celluloid.  The scene where De Niro’s and Pacino’s characters meet in the coffee shop, while subdued and dialogue driven, is as brilliantly written and filmed as could be.  The anticipation when De Niro’s character eventually has to make a pivotal life choice is as charged as they come.

Giving the characters lives outside of the “crew” gives every one of them a personality beyond the typical bad guy.  Getting rid of most of the “clever” dialogue found in the original only brought perfection to an already interesting premise.  Tweaking the ending to actually be an intense standoff between the protagonist (Pacino) and the antagonist (DeNiro) was what the first version was lacking.  The film is about the two men against each other, and how similar they are.  Giving us a peak into what makes them tick was brilliant, and most other filmmakers ought to wish they had the chance to do what Mann did here.

Perfect.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake #10

~Director: The Pang Brothers~

Original Film: Bangkok Dangerous
Year: 1999
Cast: Pawalit Mongkolpisit, Premsinee Ratanasopha, Patharawarin Timkul, Pisek Intrakanchit, Korkiate Limpapat
Language: Thai
Country: Thailand
Specs: 105 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

Wow.  I owe an apology to every film that I’ve ever given a 1 star rating to.  Can I give negative stars?  This overlong (at 1:45 even), boring, incoherent, jumbled mess of a film needed a new writer, a new editor, a new actor (am I supposed to really believe the trannie is a sexy stripper?), and a new editor (did I already say that?).  There is ZERO rhythm to the editing style of this film.  It feels like the worst student film ever made (is that even possible?) has been expanded into a feature length “film”.  How they got the money to do an American remake is beyond me.

Some of the positive aspects of this film are….they are….um…..man this is hard.  OK, the opening title sequence is a very clever and cool sequence.  On the other hand, the fact that I never know why he is a contract killer, I don’t know who the people are that he is killing, I don’t understand why the girl falls in love with him when they cannot communicate AT ALL (he doesn’t read lips, doesn’t speak any sounds (until at the end of the film after the “twist”), doesn’t know sign language, and apparently doesn’t know how to write), pains me to even spend the time to write this review.  Sadly, no, depressingly, there is no story beyond a forced attempt at a love story amidst the random ruthless killings.

This film has so little sound, so much random nonsense editing, and techno music beating throughout, it literally felt like a very very very long music video.  I’ve never been as bored with a major motion picture as I was with this.  Ugh.

HORRIBLE.

My Rating: * / F

Remake Film: Bangkok Dangerous
Year: 2008
Cast: Nicolas Cage, Charlie Yeung, Chakrit Yamnam, Nirattisai Kaljaruek, Panward Hemmanee
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 99 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

OK, I was surprised by this “by the book” action film from the directing team that also brought us “The Eye”.  I think that they completely screwed up the marketing of this film.  The trailer alone had me yawing in my seat.  Surprisingly, this remake of the 1999 film is a completely different film. Not in story, but in style.

For starters, The Pang Brothers did the wise decision and allowed the main assassin (Cage’s character) to speak.  They also added narration to the film that helped with the character exposition.  And lastly, they allowed someone else to rewrite their script, and edit their movie.

This new version is most certainly a better film in every way (compared to the original, it’s a masterpiece).  It has loads of action and suspense, feeling an awful lot like a Tony Scott film in a number of places.  It has a visual color palette that is also fitting (with the exception of the confusing choice to film the closing scene in red?).  Sequences such as the boat chase (and the camera angle showing the bullets piercing the bottom of the boat) are pleasantly exciting, and keep the interest level high.  There was nary a dull moment in this film.

While a typical action film that hits all the marks of “how to make an action film 101” (I did say, after all, that if feels like a Tony Scott film) is what The Pang Brothers delivered, it is never boring, and surprised as though I was, Cage did an OK job in the role.  I would expect that the reasons it got a mess of negative reviews are because many did not see the original.  Had they, I’m sure they would rescind most of the negativity directed at this entertaining thrill ride.

My Rating: **** / B

20 Films Remade by the Original Directors Pt.4

May 27th, 2010 by Phil Bloom

I love film.  I have studied film, worked in the film business, and created films for both a hobby and a living.  Watching movies is a wonderful experience.  Watching movies that are simply wonderful is an experience I’d deem delightful.  Watching lovely films that were remade as substandard is simply atrocious.  It is because of this reason that many filmgoers like myself sit to watch a remake of a previously produced film with extremely dubious assumptions.

It is why I, after hearing of David Cronenberg and Géla Babluani’s plans to remake “The Fly” and “13 Tazameti”, respectively, I decided to take a look at 20 other films that were remade by the original 20 directors.

Thankfully,  there are many times when the remakes far exceed the original film in tone, story, and execution.  Many times, it is clear that the director revisited his earlier film with years of maturity, experience, and reflection to expand on a story dear to his heart.

Unfortunately, today’s films are not in that category.

“Remaking the Tinsel in Tinseltown”

Or

“20 Films Remade by the Original Directors”

Part IV

Remake #7

~Director: George Marshall~

Original Film: Destry Rides Again
Year: 1939
Cast: James Stewart, Marlene Dietrich, Mischa Auer, “Charlie” Winninger
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 94 mins / Black and White / OAR 1.37:1

Excellent western sets the bar high for many years to follow.  The superbly written banter, clever dialogue, funny quips all add to this very well written script.  After losing a bet over his pants with Dietrich, one cowboy says, “I can’t.  It’s undignified.  Think of my position!  I’ve met every king in Europe”  Dietrich retorts in perfect comedic timing “Now you’ve met two Aces in Bottleneck.  Off with those pants”.  Another perfectly executed scene involves every patron in the bar teasing Stewart for his gentlemanly ways.  The bartender asks “Whattaya have?  Milk?” Steward answers “Yeah, I think I will!”  The look of sudden surprise on the bartenders face is excellently timed.

The opening scene with Dietrich pulling a fast one on the local ranch hands poker game is classic.  Her titillating character as the tavern owner / cabaret performer is very memorable and superbly portrayed by the consummate actress.  The wonderful direction by Marshall has Dietrich’s character hiding gold down her bra, displaying a very simple act that so cleverly defines her character.  Her cat fight with Mrs. Callahan and Stewart is so exceptionally staged and dramatic that it stands head and shoulders above most other fight scenes.  In fact, the whole scene is played with the actual actors, instead of stuntmen, and it adds to the realism of this scene, as well as the film.

The acting chops on display in this film are so spectacular, the plot so well written, the direction so amazing, this is simply one of the best.

My Rating: ***** / A

Remake Film: Destry
Year: 1954
Cast: Audie Murphy, Mari Blanchard, Lyle Bettger, Thomas Mitchell, Edgar Buchanan, Wallace Ford
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 95 mins / Color – Technicolor / OAR 1.85:1

What happened?  For starters, there isn’t much different from Marshall’s spectacular 1939 version of this film apart from the cast.  Other than the upgrade to widescreen and 3-Strip Technicolor, this a far less superior version in every way.  The cast, and the direction for that matter, is so flawed, I cringed at the fact that the same director was behind this film.

For starters, the mayor has been re-envisioned as a bumbling idiot.  Attempting to replace the iconic Marlene Dietrich proved futile at best.  Frenchie is uncomfortably generic and uninspiring, lacking even the smallest iota of villainess qualities.  The scene involving the bet for pants, a running gag throughout the original, is a quick bet for a woman’s hat.

Audie Murphy as Destry, played by the charismatic James Stewart in the original, now has ZERO charisma.  Much of the dialogue from the first film is retained, word for word, Sadly, this time however, either the actors were given horrible direction for the comedic timing or they lacked the acting abilities to pull it off.

There is no mystery as to the location of the old sheriff, and none of the clever manipulating Destry performs to defeat the town villains.  This time he simply “stumbles” into almost every situation.  Little character traits that added depth and insight into the character, such as Destry whittling away at wood to create napkin holders, has been rewritten as fiddling with a piece of rope, tying knots the most basic of knots.

All in all, I was never completely convinced Marshall knew what he was thinking, nor the reason behind the soulless direction.  Simply put, a terrible film with a sissy for a lead in Audie Murphy.

My Rating: ** / D+

Remake #8

~Director: George Sluizer~

Original Film: Spoorloos (“The Vanishing”)
Year: 1988
Cast: Johanna ter Steege, Gene Bervoets, Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu
Language: Dutch / French
Country: Netherlands / France
Specs: 107 mins / Color / OAR 1.66:1

This Dutch film is a hauntingly tense suspenseful thriller.  If you have not seen this film, I highly suggest you do so today.  It is simply riveting with its portrayal not only of the inner turmoil the victims boyfriend goes under, but also the very believable actions of the perpetrator and his preparations.  The film takes place in both the Netherlands and France, which adds tension in the form of being in a strange land, having a crime take place, and not completely being familiar with the language.  Surprisingly, the film is strictly a character driven story with a very nontraditional (in Hollywood terms) ending.  Even more surprising, the film contains very little coarse language, zero nudity and zero violence.  A true testament to the filmmaking prowess of Sluizer.

If it doesn’t appear obvious, this is certainly, without question, an excellently produced foreign film.

My Rating: **** / B

Remake Film: The Vanishing
Year: 1993
Cast: Jeff Bridges, Kiefer Sutherland, Nancy Travis, Sandra Bullock
Language: English
Country: United States
Specs: 109 mins / Color / OAR 1.85:1

As with the previous remake, I ask “What went wrong?”  A typical vanilla plain thriller with very predictable ending is a bland remake of the far superior Dutch film.  This version, for reasons I cannot fathom, was directed in a style completely different from Sluizer’s first effort.  It appears he was under a deadline, as the film feels completely rushed, with any sense of character development gone.  Bridges character, whom in the original was brilliantly portrayed as having a relationship with a family, is nearly nonexistent.  The dichotomy between good and evil, so cleverly evident in the original, has been completely erased, simply making the character of Barney nothing more than a sadistic evil creep.

Additions such as having Sutherland’s character being a novel writer contracted to write about his experience, and turning the new girlfriend into a super sleuth is silly and absurd.  How she knows that he’s been buried alive, and how she has the strength to easily fight off the twice her size attacker is Hollywood nonsense.  In fact, it seems at times that Sluizer intended to film an updated version of Sherlock Holmes, as her detective skills in finding him at a hotel, and finding the daughter to get directions to the house is more far fetched than an episode of Batman: Detective.

Lastly, the complete rewrite of the ending to a more traditional, and predictable, ending is tantamount to having a graphic on the screen read “For the easily pleased audience”.

Such wasted talent, both for the director and the usually entertaining cast.  A witless remake, through and through.

My Rating: *** / C-